By Ridders - 1/19/2010 9:43:47 AM
The En-Route NOTAMS seem fine, however In some FIR (EGTT) NOTAM info pasted in from Navair has some oddness.
Example:
Theres two notams for shoreham, which are:
Ref: C0568/10
FIR: EGTT
Code: MRLC
Traffic: VFR IFR
Purpose: Immed. atten. aircraft operators PIB entry Operationally significant for flights
Scope: Aerodrome
Lower limit (FL): 000
Upper limit (FL): 999
Centre and radius (nm): 5050N00018W005
Parent ICAO: EGKA
Start date/time: 17/01/2010 17:04 UTC
End date/time: 24/01/2010 18:00 UTC(estimate)
Activity period: null
Lower height limit: 000
Upper height limit: 999
GRASS RWY 07/25 AND 13/31 CLSD TO FIXED WING ACFT DUE FLOODING
AND:
Ref: C0569/10
FIR: EGTT
Code: LBAS
Traffic: VFR
Purpose: Misc
Scope: Aerodrome
Lower limit (FL): 000
Upper limit (FL): 999
Centre and radius (nm): 5050N00018W005
Parent ICAO: EGKA
Start date/time: 17/01/2010 17:15 UTC
End date/time: 24/01/2010 18:00 UTC(estimate)
Activity period: null
Lower height limit: 000
Upper height limit: 999
IBN 'SH' U/S
Skydemon shows the first EGKA with Biggin Hill in the text, so I suspect the Parsing is doing some strange stuff.
Same thing happens with Goodwood Notam that picks up the Eaglescott info.
Heres the source thats pasted.. I think the parsing is in error. Unless, Im misreading the way to get NOTAMs pasted in from the external site?
|
By Tim Dawson - 4/8/2010 5:28:09 PM
They are shown, in detail, in the NOTAM briefing window. There's just no point in plotting them on the map, so we don't.
|
|